AI Rater Guidelines Writer (Linguist / Instructional Designer)

Category: Education & Learning Evaluation · Pay: $45–$65 / hr · Location: Remote — US-eligible · Contractor AI Rater Guidelines Writer (Linguist / Instructional Designer) is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs across domain writing workflows.

About the role: AI Rater Guidelines Writer (Linguist / Instructional Designer) is a remote review track for evaluating AI outputs across domain writing workflows. Reviewers grade workflow correctness, policy adherence, and stakeholder fit; flag operational risk; and document the right next step so the modeling team can train on it. Domain writing AI has to fit into an actual day at work. Aura One uses experienced operators to grade outputs the way a senior peer would — checking workflow, policy, and the unwritten rules that decide whether a task actually gets done. Review tutoring and assessment output. Judge it against how real learners use it.

Responsibilities: Review AI outputs against current domain writing workflows, playbooks, and firm policy for AI Rater Guidelines Writer (Linguist / Instructional Designer) assignments. Grade tone, escalation logic, and stakeholder fit on a structured rubric. Flag operational risk, missed escalations, and policy-adherence gaps with severity tags. Capture the right next step so the modeling team can train on it. Role details Track Operations & business review Work model Remote · Independent specialist contractor Compensation $45–$65 / hr Eligible from US What you should bring Direct working experience in domain writing on real teams for AI Rater Guidelines Writer (Linguist / Instructional Designer) work. Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches. Clear written reasoning that names the policy or workflow being applied. Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem. Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week. Example tasks Grade a model's response to a real domain writing ticket and rate workflow, tone, and escalation. Flag a missed escalation with the right severity tag and corrected next step. Adjudicate a disputed playbook call between two reviewers using firm guidance. Audit a 25-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead. Useful experience Prior experience training, calibrating, or QA-ing operations teams. Familiarity with AI-assisted workflow tooling and its failure modes. Bilingual experience for cross-region operations. Compensation and schedule $45–$65 / hr Expected arrangement: contractor, with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation. Skills used in matching Operational review Policy adherence Workflow judgment Stakeholder communication Domain writing